Games of Words
Although English is my second language, I still want to play some games of words even it seems awkward.
By BookWolf
Originally it may look like this:
When I see the motion, I want to see the direction;
When I see the direction, I want to see the destination;
When I see the destination, I am expected to have action;
And on a sunny day, I thought it may look better to describe a scene of debugging:
During Investigating an Interaction, I Monitor a Motion;
While I Monitor a Motion, I try to Deduct a Direction;
After I Deduct a direction, I may Conclude a Connection;
From the Concluded Connection, I can Accumulate a series of Actions;
(So the answer is debugging or discovery or deducting or ...)
I never regard myself as any kind of genius by any chance. On the contrary, I think I am a common man with a very common wish to try to look like somewhat uncommon. And this is not very uncommon, right?
You live only if you are in danger and difficulties;
You die if only you were in safety and slackness;
I think. So, I am; -----ME
You run. So, you are; ------PC
For all prices, by all means, to be ready, to be free.
Sometimes eagles may fly as low as swallows;
However, swallows can never fly as high as eagles.
observe:
eagles are in Big Oh of swallows,
and swallows are in Omega of eagles.
(Am I right?? I am always confused by these.)
I like the beginning sentence of 《DaoDeJing》 written by my most respected philosopher Mr. Laoszi of ancient China in 2000 years ago. And I think it is a proper description for programming language development. Therefore it is also used as beginning of my small term paper for a study of comp348:
The rule for all rules can be formulized except it should only be an uncommon rule;
The way of all naming procedures can be named except it should only come from an uncommon way.
Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) is such an abused word that whenever I heard it is used in improper way I just cannot help to try to invent a new term to avoid this abuse------Intelligence Automation (I.A.).
Il y a du nouveau-----There is something new.
Be patient to see my Enigma.
It is said by someone as following:
Anger is only one letter short of danger. If someone betrays you once, it is his fault; if he betrays you twice, it is your fault.
And I just deduced as following:
(But what is the definition of betray you twice? If betray twice means "double" betray, it is certainly not your fault. Since he or she betrayed you once, if he or she wanted to betray you twice, he or she needed to change his or her faith such as joining you again in order to betray you. However, by joining you again he or she already betrayed again, even though he or she hadn't betrayed you yet. In this sense of betray you twice, he or she already betrayed in generally three times.) Does this garbage satisfy your interest in this corner?
I dug from my old project for hours and found a good one which I wrote about one year ago: A DFA class which functions as a DFS searching "template". It is quite a happiness to find something you have done and forgotten. So, I made a special note for it. It is not that kind of hard one, but it is, I personally consider, a elegant one because I made a detailed comment on it.
Real programmer only uses C/C++, but super program may use Scheme.
The marvellous comment from <Yes, Prime Minister> about British press by Prime Minister. The <Daily Mirror> is read by people who believe they run the country; The The <Guardian> is read by people who think they ought to run the country; The <Times> is read by people who do run the country; The <Daily Mail> is read by wives of the people who run the country; The <Financial Times> is read by people who own the country; The <Morning Star> is read by people who think the country should be run by another country; The <Daily Telegraph> is read by people who think it is; The <Sun> is read by the people who don't care who runs the country as long as get big tits.